| HOME
|
Table 1: Which Loan Costs the Least?
LOAN |
Fees |
Interest |
Other |
#1
|
origination = 2% |
1-yr Treasury + 1.6% adjusted yearly; 2%
annual & 5% overall caps |
insurance = 2% + 0.5% on loan balance;
monthly servicing fee |
#2
|
origination = 2% |
prime + 3% adjusted monthly, no cap;
overall max. 21% |
|
#3
|
origination = 1.5%; maturity = 2.0% |
9.75% on lump sum & monthly; 12.5% on
creditline |
deferred annuity + up to 50% of
appreciation |
#4
|
(if a borrower selects maximum
benefits) the total amount owed at maturity equals the home's value at that time minus 7%
of appreciation since closing times 75% OR - if it is greater - 75% of value at closing
reduced by 3.75% for each year of the borrower's remaining life expectancy at closing;
BUT, if the loan is repaid within 4 years of closing, the total amount owed equals the
devalued 75% plus 13% interest compounded annually over the life of the loan |
Each of the four reverse
mortgage loans described in Table 1 has been
offered in the United States. But even though this table tells you all about
the costs of these loans, you cannot tell which one costs the least. The
categories of cost are different from one loan to another, which makes
them almost impossible to compare.
Moreover, you don't know how much money a borrower could get from
one
loan versus another. In "forward" mortgages, the dollar amount of major cost
items is directly related to the amount of the proceeds a borrower gets from
the loan. In a reverse mortgage this is not always true.
So now let's simplify the matter by comparing one HECM loan to
another.
That way the cost categories would be the same, and that should make
the loans much easier to compare.
Back to Top
Table 2: Which HECM Costs Less?
| |
|
LOAN A |
LOAN B |
| Age |
|
75 |
75 |
| Status |
|
single |
single |
| Home Value |
|
$150K |
$150K |
| 203-b Limit |
|
$150K |
$150K |
| Interest |
|
8% |
8% |
| MIP |
|
$3,000 |
$3,000 |
| Closing |
|
$3,500 |
$3,500 |
| Servicing |
|
$30 |
$30 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
So which costs less: the Loan A or Loan B? The categories of
cost are
the same, and both loans are HECMs. In fact, all of the itemized costs are
exactly the same. But there is virtually no likelihood that these two loans
will cost the same.
In the left-hand column you can see that three boxes are blank. This
means
that three cost factors are missing. Can you guess what they are? Let's take
a closer look at these "identical" loans.
Table 3: Two HECMs at Closing
| |
Loan A |
Loan B |
| Payment Plan |
LUMP SUM |
MONTHLY TENURE |
| |
|
|
Net Cash
to Borrower |
$70,298 |
$562 |
Total
Financed Costs |
$6,500 |
$6,500 |
| Loan Balance |
$76,798 |
$7,062 |
Here we are outside the bank when Borrower A and Borrower B
emerge
from their HECM closings with their "identical" loans. The first thing we
learn is that Borrower A took the entire loan as an immediate lump sum
of cash at closing, and Borrower B took it as a monthly advance only.
Borrower A has come away from the deal with $70,298, and when we ask
how much it cost her to get it, she tells us $6500, which is the total of all the
upfront costs back on Table 2. Now we ask Borrower B how much she paid
for her loan, and she tells us the same thing: $6500. But when we ask how
much money she got out of the deal, she tells us $562 - so far.
So who would you say has gotten the better deal - so far? Both have
paid
$6500 for the loan, but A now has $70,298 and B has has $562. So far,
you would have to say that Borrower A has gotten more for the same
amount of money - a lot more. But let's not jump to conclusions. Let's
wait a while, and see how things develop. What will these "identical"
loans look like two years later?
Table 4: Two HECMs After Two Years
| |
Loan A |
Loan B |
| Payment Plan |
LUMPSUM |
MONTHLY TENURE |
Net Cash
to Borrower |
$70,298
|
$562/mo.
($13,488) |
| |
|
|
| Total Costs |
$21,464 |
$9,751 |
| |
|
|
| Balance |
$91,762 |
$23,239 |
Two years later, Borrower A still has gotten only the lump sum
she started
out with. But now her loans costs total $21,464 - this includes the upfront
costs, the monthly servicing fees, and the interest that has been charged
on her large lump sum and on her other costs and fees. But the total
amount of cash she has gotten is still more than three times greater
than her total loan costs.
By contrast, Borrower B has now gotten $13,488 ($562 per month for
24 months). But that isn't even anywhere close to two times as much
as her total loan costs. So Borrower A has still gotten more bang for
her buck. For every dollar in costs she has gotten $3.28 in benefits,
while for every dollar in costs Borrower B has gotten only $1.38 in
benefits.
Borrower B may be starting the long process of catching up to the
deal that Borrower A got, but she has a long way to go. Borrower A -
so far - has still gotten more for her money.
But how would you express that numerically? Take a look at the next
table.
Table 5: TALC after Two Years
| |
Loan A |
Loan B |
| Payment Plan |
LUMP SUM |
MONTHLY TENURE |
| |
|
|
Net Cash
to Borrower |
$70,298
(PV) |
$562/mo
(PMT) |
| |
|
|
| Balance (FV) |
$91,762 |
$23,239 |
| |
|
|
| TALC Rate |
13.4% |
49.5% |
Do you have a simple financial calculator? If you do, you can
try this
at home. For Borrower A, punch in $70,298 as the "present value"
(how much she got at closing). Then punch in $91,762 as the "future
value" (how much she owes after two years). Then punch in 24
months (two years). Now punch the "interest" button to find out what
single rate of interest it would take to make $70,298 grow to become
$91,762 after two years. The answer (after you've multiplied by 12 to
change the monthly rate to an annual one) is 13.4% per year.
In other words, if the lender could not charge loan costs in
different
ways (interest, origination, insurance, closing costs, servicing fees,
etc.) but had to roll all of the costs into the interest rate, what would
that rate have to be to generate the same future amount owed as
you would get by charging the separate costs? That's the Total
Annual Loan Cost (TALC) rate. Put another way, if you were
charged 13.4% interest on $70,298 for two years, you would
owe $91,762.
Now let's try it for Borrower B to find out how much more her loan
advances have cost her - so far. Punch in $562 as the "payment,"
$23,239 as the "future value," 24 months (making sure to set the
calculator for "beginning of the month" which is when the loan
advances are made), and then the interest button. Now multiply
by 12. The TALC rate in this case is a whopping 49.5% -
confirming our suspicion that Borrower B has paid a lot more
for what she's gotten - so far.
Why is Borrower B's rate so high? Because her total costs so far
($9,751) are still a very large part of what she owes ($23,239). In
fact, these costs are over 40% of her total debt. By contrast,
Borrower A's total costs are less than 25% of what she owes -
and she had all of her money since the very first day of the loan.
It's taken Borrower B two full years to get her money.
So far, we have seen that the real cost of these loans depends
on the type of loan advances you select, that is, how much money
you get, and when you get it. Now let's take a look at another
factor you are probably starting see: time.
Table 6: TALC Rates Over Time
| |
Loan A |
Loan B |
| Payment Plan |
LUMP SUM |
MONTHLY TENURE |
| |
|
|
| TALC Rate after |
|
|
2 years |
13.4% |
49.5% |
12 years |
10.0% |
10.8% |
17 years |
8.3% |
9.0% |
22 years |
7.3% |
6.5% |
The TALC rate comes down over time for two reasons. First, as
the
upfront loan costs get spread out over more and more years, they
become a smaller part of the total amount owed. Second, as the
loan balance rises over time, the likelihood increases that it will
catch up to - and then be limited by - the home's value. Remember,
reverse mortgages are nonrecourse loans - so you can never owe
more than the future value of the home. When a rising loan balance
catches up to that value, the borrower cannot owe more than that value.
For example, Borrower B has taken monthly advances for as long as
she lives in her home ("tenure" advances). Assume that her home
value never increases after closing. When her rising loan balance
catches up to that non-rising home value, her debt is then capped by
the home's value. If that value remains fixed, she will continue getting
monthly advances every month, but her loan balance will not increase.
And that will drive the TALC rate down at a faster rate. The nonrecourse
limit accelerates the decrease in the TALC rate.
Even when a home's value grows, the loan balance may still catch up
to it and -when it does - be limited by its future value, which will most
likely grow at a slower rate than the loan balance otherwise would have
(without the nonrecourse limit). If a home's value decreases, on the
other hand, a borrower could have a declining debt despite continuing
to receive loan advances every month.
So changes in a home's value are a key factor in determining the
loan's total annual average cost. Table 7 shows the effect of home
appreciation on the TALC rate. The smaller the appreciation rate, the
lower the rate will tend to be over time - because the rising loan balance
will catch up to - and then be limited by - the home's value sooner. The
larger the appreciation rate, the greater the TALC rate will tend to be
over time - because the rising loan balance will not catch up to the
home's value as soon - if ever. And if it does, a higher appreciation
rate will place less of a cap on the growing loan balance than a smaller
rate would.
Back to Top
Table 7: TALCs on 3 HECMs
Home
Appreciate Rate = |
0%
|
4%
|
8%
|
| LUMP SUM |
|
|
|
@ 2 years |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
@ 12 years |
5.9 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
@ 17 years |
4.1 |
8.3 |
9.7 |
CREDITLINE
(50% at closing) |
|
|
|
@ 2 years |
19.4 |
19.4 |
19.4 |
@ 12 years |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
@ 17 years |
8.5 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
| TENURE (monthly) |
|
|
|
@ 2 years |
49.5 |
49.5 |
49.5 |
@ 12 years |
8.4 |
10.8 |
10.8 |
@ 17 years |
2.2 |
9.0 |
9.8 |
Table 7 also shows the impact of loan advances on the TALC rate.
TALC rates on lump sum loans don't vary as much as they do on
monthly advance loans. Creditline loans generally fall somewhere
in between, depending on how the borrower uses the creditline.
If it's used more like a lump sum, the actual TALC rates will be
more like lump sum TALCs. If it's used more like a monthly
advance, the actual TALC's will be more like monthly advance
TALCs.
In the official TALC disclosure , however, lenders are instructed to
assume that the borrower will withdraw 50% of the avaiulable
creditline at closing, and none thereafter. This is the assumption
used to poroject the TALC rates in Table 7.
So now we return to our original question. Can you name the three
non-cost factors that affect the total annual average cost of a
reverse mortgage? As we've seen, and as they are displayed
in Table 8, they are
- the pattern of loan advances ("Payments"),
- how long the borrower lives in the home ("Term"), and
- what happens to the home's value during that time
("Appreciation").
Curiously, these key cost factors are not controlled by the lender.
To the extent that anyone can know at closing how these factors
will play out over time, the borrower may have a better sense of
each than the lender. But then, the lender who originates the loan
generally is not affected financially by its total annual average
annual cost rate. The lender's earnings on the loan typically equal
the origination fee and some portion of the servicing fee. So
lenders generally get paid the same no matter what the loan
ends up costing the borrower.
Back to Top
Table 8: Which HECM Costs Less?
| |
LOAN A |
LOAN B |
| Age |
75 |
75 |
| Status |
single |
single |
| Home Value |
$150K |
$150K |
| 203-b Limit |
$150K |
$150K |
| Interest |
8% |
8% |
| MIP |
$3,000 |
$3,000 |
| Closing |
$3,500 |
$3,500 |
| Servicing |
$30 |
$30 |
| Payments |
? |
? |
| Term |
? |
? |
| Appreciation |
? |
? |
Back to Top
HOME
Copyright © NCHEC. All rights reserved.
Revised: May 08, 2006.
|